FED2025 – Tasmanian Federal Election Result

This post is the second in my series looking at the results of the 2025 Federal election by state.

In short Tasmania produced an emphatic victory for Labor with a state-wide two-party preferred swing of 9%.

Former state Labor Leader Rebecca White easily retained the central seat of Lyons for labor with a 10.7% swing in her favour. Big swings delivered the state’s two northern seats to Labor, Bass gained on a 9.4% swing and Braddon a massive 15.2% swing.

Given current events that look set to send Tasmania to a state election in July, some have suggested the move by Labor to force an election has been to capitalise on the Liberal Party’s disastrous Federal result.

That suggestion ignores two critical facts. The first is that Tasmania uses the proportional Hare-Clark electoral system to elect the lower house of its Parliament so Labor’s huge two-party preferred result is irrelevant. Second, Labor’s huge two-party preferred result was constructed from a Labor primary result of 36.6% that would not deliver majority government if repeated at a state election.

That the Federal Liberal Party polled a primary vote of only 24.5% suggests that Labor could emerge as the largest party at a state election, but not as a majority government.

The most recent EMRS poll of state voting intentions reported party standings at Liberal 29 per cent (down 5), Labor 31 (up 1), Greens 14 (up 1), Jacqui Lambie Network 6 (down 2) and Independents an impressive 17 (up 5). A significant caveat on the poll is whether is was picking up washover from Federal voting intentions.

The two big Tasmanian issues are the state of the budget, and the related burden of paying to build an expensive AFL stadium at Macquarie Point. There is clear public support for the state to have an AFL team, but support for the proposed stadium is much weaker. Both major parties currently support the stadium, but the majority of cross bench members do not and opposition to the proposal is particularly strong in the state’s north.

I’ll come back to the Federal result inside the post, but first a brief diversion to the events currently unfolding in Hobart.

Is there going to be a state election?

Tasmania looks set for a July election after last week’s passage of a no confidence motion in Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff.

The motion was moved by Labor Leader Dean Winter, backed by the Greens, and supported by enough crossbenchers to pass. The Parliament met again on Tuesday and passed a supply bill covering the period until a new Parliament can meet after an election. Premier Rockliff then visited Governor Barbara Baker and offered advice that the House of Assembly be dissolved ahead of an election. Governor Baker is currently considering the advice and will meet the Premier again later this week. She met Labor Leader Dean Winter on Wednesday.

As the motion was in the Premier rather than the government, an immediate election could be avoided if Jeremy Rockliff resigned and was replaced by a new Liberal Leader. There seems no sign yet that the Liberal Party will change leader.

To avoid an election the Greens have offered to back the formation of a Labor government, but Labor power brokers remember the damage that past periods governing with the Greens have done to the party’s standing with the electorate.

These alternatives to an early election are no doubt part of the Governor’s deliberations. We will find out her decision later this week.

It seems no one involved with the passage of the motion thinks that the state needs a new election 16 months after the last.

It is the shortest period between elections since Queensland in the 1950s. The Gair Labor government was re-elected with a big majority in May 1956, but less than a year later a major split developed and Premier Gair and most of his cabinet were expelled from the Labor Party. Just 15 months after the previous election, the Coalition was elected to office in August 1957. Labor remained on the opposition benches for the next 32 years.

The events that may be leading to an early Tasmanian election are not as dramatic,

The current state of the House of Assembly is Liberal 14, Labor 10, Greens 5, Independents 5 and one Jacqui Lambie Network member. Two of the Independents were elected last year as Lambie Network candidates.

The Tasmanian Hare-Clark electoral system uses the five federal Divisions to elect seven members each to the House of Assembly, a total of 35 members.

As a rough guide, a party or candidates can win election by reaching the quota of 12.5%. Quotas can be filled by first preference votes, preferences from excluded candidates, and preferences from surplus to quota votes of elected candidates. As a rough guide, a party elects two members with 25%, three with 37.5%, and a majority four seats if it reaches 50%. The role of preferences means a party has a chance of electing four members if its vote reaches around 43%, but it depends on the share of vote by party as well how evenly a party’s vote is split between its candidates.

The table below shows the party vote share by division by party at the 2024 state election. It is clear from this table that both major parties need a significant boost in support to achieve majority government.

2024 Tasmanian Election Result – % Party Vote by Division
Division ALP LIB GRN JLN SFF OTH
Bass 29.8 38.0 12.0 8.1 2.4 9.7
Braddon 24.7 45.6 6.6 11.4 2.9 8.8
Clark 30.5 27.1 20.9 .. 1.5 20.0
Franklin 27.3 34.0 19.8 4.9 .. 14.0
Lyons 32.8 37.6 10.9 8.3 4.8 5.6
State-wide 29.0 36.7 13.9 6.7 2.3 11.4

There are seven parties registered to contest a Tasmanian election.

  • Animal Justice Party
  • Australian Labor Party
  • Jacqui Lambie Network
  • Liberal Party of Australia
  • National Party of Australia
  • Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party
  • Tasmanian Greens

Jacqui Lambie has suggested her party will not contest the state election but the Nationals have announced they will make a rare foray into Tasmanian state politics.

Tasmania’s Federal Election Result

The map below shows Tasmania’s five Federal divisions. Four are Labor held, the northern seats of Bass and Braddon being gained on 3 May, indicated on the map by crosshatching. The inner-Hobart seat of Clark was retained by Independent Andrew Wilkie.

If you click/tap on a division, there is a pop-up showing the elected member, seat margin and swing at the election.

It was a result that again wiped out the Liberal Party. For the sixth time at 10 elections since 1998, the Tasmanian Liberal Party has elected no members to the House of Representatives.

As the chart below, Labor’s two-party preferred vote achieved a modern high-point in 2025, reaching 63.3% after a swing of 9%.

First preference results and change in vote were –

  • Labor Party 36.6% (+9.3)
  • Liberal Party a disastrous 24.5% (-8.4)
  • Independents 17.9% (+6.8)
  • Greens 11.1% (-0.9)
  • One Nation 6.0% (+2.0)
  • Trumpet of Patriots 2.5%, up 0.7 compared to the United Australia Party in 2022
  • Others 1.3% (-11.4), in large party due to there being no lower house Jacqui Lambie Network candidates in 2025 despite the party polling 6.8% in 2022.

The primary vote change for Labor and Liberal is reflected in the seats. In Lyons, Labor’s vote rose +14.0%, Liberal down -11.0%. The same figures for Bass were +11.0% and -8.3%, for Braddon +17.0% and -12.4%.

In 2022 Bridget Archer become only the second Bass MHR in three decades to win re-election. In 2025 she was defeated by Labor’s Jess Teesdale who had spent many years teaching outside the state and was rarely mentioned as a possible new member for Bass. Following the path trod by defeated Federal members for Bass, Archer is set to be a state candidate for Bass, a route taken previously by Michelle O’Byrne (Labor) and Michael Ferguson (Liberal).

In Braddon the Liberal party was disadvantaged by the retirement of two term MHR Gavin Pearce while Labor talked Senator Anne Urquhart into abandoning her 15 year career in the Senate to successfully contest Braddon. It will be interesting to see if defeated Liberal candidate Mal Hingston now contests Braddon at the state election.

In Lyons Labor recruited well in former state leader Rebecca White, who had topped the poll in Lyons at the last three state elections. Her predecessor Brian Mitchell is now mentioned as a possible state candidate for Lyons.

Clark was again a walk-over for Independent Andrew Wilkie while in Franklin the Liberal Party vote slipped under 20%, outpolled by anti-salmon farm campaigner Peter George. Labor MP Julie Collins had a small swing to her on first preferences and had no difficulty winning on preferences.

Labor led on first preferences in the four seats it won, not relying on Green preferences as in the past. Of all two-party preferences, including an alternative distribution of preferences from Wilkie and George, Labor attracted 68.7% of preferences to 31.3% for the Liberal Party.

As the chart of primary vote support since 1984 shows, Labor opened a wide gap over the Liberal Party in 2025, the widest since 2010. Both major parties have lost support over the past four decades, but the Tasmanian Liberal Party’s decline appears more consistent. The Greens have not been able to repeat their record vote of 2010, in part due to Andrew Wilkie dominating progressive support in the Greens’ heartland seat of Clark.

On a final point, let me repeat the earlier table of results by division and party but based on the 2025 Federal election.

FED25 Federal Result – % Party Vote by Tasmanian Division
Division ALP LIB GRN ONP TOP IND OTH
Bass 39.6 31.4 12.9 6.5 3.2 5.0 1.0
Braddon 39.5 31.7 8.4 7.6 4.5 8.2 ..
Clark 20.0 13.7 13.2 4.2 .. 48.9 ..
Franklin 39.0 18.8 10.5 5.0 .. 26.7 ..
Lyons 43.1 26.2 10.9 6.7 4.7 3.2 5.2
State-wide 36.6 24.5 11.1 6.0 2.5 17.9 1.4

Using these primary votes you can estimate that Labor could get 14-15 seats at a state election. But since the defeat of the last state Labor government in 2014, Labor’s state results have been consistently weaker than the party’s Federal results. Labor has consistently polled badly in Bass and Braddon at state elections even though Labor has managed to win both seats at Federal elections.

Assessing how the Liberal Party might perform based on Federal results is difficult given how its Federal vote has disappeared in Clark and Franklin in recent years. The party has clearly put more effort into its state campaign in both seats.

If a state election is held, it will be dominated by very different issues to the Federal campaign. The no-confidence vote should make the budget and state debt central to the campaign. Both major parties will continue to back the Macquarie Point stadium, but how the development can be kept separate from debate over the budget is hard to see. The government will continue to be embarrassed by the bungled port development to accommodate the new Spirit of Tasmania ferries.

Recent years have seen a growth in Independents contesting state elections, collecting the 100 nomination signatures required for their own column on ballot papers. The same trend could continue in 2025. It has been a successful tactic in Clark and Franklin at recent state elections. Will it be repeated in Bass, Braddon and Lyons?

And will it lead to northern Independents running against the cost to their local pockets of building a football stadium in Hobart?

6 thoughts on “FED2025 – Tasmanian Federal Election Result”

  1. I am not a fan of the Hare-Clark method of allocating votes. Mainly because I prefer methods that maximize the ability to have durable majority governments. I have always felt that the Federal system for the House worked best. Admittedly I do not know much about local Tasmanian politics just like the rest of us what we read on the news. That said, the parliament has begun to resemble something like France or Italy with enduring chaos and a lessened chance of a stable government. It feels a bit like moving the food around on your plate and hoping it tastes better at the next bite. It is almost as though everyone gets a participation trophy no one really wins and no one really loses. I have my personal preferences but I understand that when voters are unhappy someone needs to sit down for a while. If the conditions are no better at the next election then those people need to sit down, etc. A surprise may happen but it seems like things may shake out much like has been indicated here – maybe a couple 2-3 seats for Labor, the Liberals at or slightly below and the crossbench a little less depending on how the ex-JLN members fare.

    1. Craig, it’s probably more a symptom of the parties themselves rather than the electoral system. In the ACT which also uses Hare-Clark, minority or coalition governments are frequent and the major parties (Labor and Liberal) work well with minor party and independent MPs.

      Although the ACT uses 5 member seats rather than 7, so a better option for Tasmania might be to use seven 5 member districts rather than the current five 7 member ones.

      COMMENT: There are major difference to the structure of government and society in Tasmania and the ACT though. The ACT has no local government and the ACT is an odd combination of local and state government, running both hospitals and transport as well as doing local planning, rubbish removal and public parking. It also does a lot of its work through a committee structure, again a hybrid of local government and state government.

      This has impacts on the entire structure of government in the ACT. In Tasmania candidates can be very well known through activities in local government, unions, business etc. In Tasmania there are also strong regional differences across the state.

      The ACT has many people who have moved there to work in the public service and matters connected with Federal parliament. There is a much lower level of connection with issues involving ACT rather than Federal politics. And candidates who run for ACT elections less well known than in Tasmania for those reasons I mentioned about lacking local government and state-wide organisations. Which is why linear voting, numbering straight down a party ticket, is much higher in the ACT than Tasmania.

  2. Minority governments are common in the Nordic region yet Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Iceland are the four happiest and least corrupt countries world-wide. The control of our two main parties by big business, especially fossil fuel companies, ensures we have been force-fed the propaganda that minority government equals chaos. That is incorrect.

    1. Penny, there are plenty of examples to the contrary – not least pre-2016 Italy, Belgium all the time (taking up to 2 years to form a government), Netherlands marginally less bad, Canada in the last Parliament deteriorated substantially, plus many provincial examples in places that could also be pertinent to Tasmania. Even Denmark that you cite, has had some issues in the past. There’s no correlation with happiness and minority government. Plus it’s easy to be ‘happy’ when your country is generally neutral in major world issues, someone has to stand up to the bad guys.

      I just don’t agree therefore, and think it could equally be said that it’s modern propaganda that the weakness of minority government is an advantage as somehow everyone will be more nice and compromise more and, honestly, everything will get done and we won’t just live with the status quo at best or chaos at worst! Doesn’t happen like that sadly 🙂

  3. It’s a problem from ACT and Tasmania. If everyone in every state isn’t voting the same, it cannot be a true democracy, true.

    COMMENT: At federal elections every Australian votes the same way, the same electoral system, the same form of ballot paper. There are differences for separate state and territory elections, but there are not state and territory differences for the conduct of Federal elections.

  4. The Hare Clark is a voting system in the ACT and Tasmania only. We are all the one country so we should have continuity of input (data) votes for the purest vote (data) results. The the election out come cannot be contested and the elected is victorious.

    COMMENT: Hare-Clark is used for local parliamentary elections in the ACT and Tasmania, not for Federal elections. At federal elections every Australian votes the same way, the same electoral system, the same form of ballot paper in every state.

Leave a Reply